Much respect to Ana Toledo in her work on this case. I am aware that you can only argue legal theories on appeal which were raised at the trial level. Ana is wisely raising all the relevant legal theories in her pre trial motions so she can argue them on appeal, evan if there is no trial. Brilliant work, Ana. Thank you so much.
"The law enforcement privilege is designed "to prevent disclosure of law enforcement techniques and procedures, to preserve confidentiality of sources, to protect witness and law enforcement personnel, to safeguard the privacy of individuals involved in an investigation, and otherwise to prevent interference with an investigation." "
Audit of the Department of Justice Terrorist Watchlist Nomination Processes, 2008:
"Nomination of Non-Investigative Subjects
In addition to nominating subjects of its terrorist investigations, the FBI has a formal process for nominating to the watchlist known or suspected international terrorists who are not subjects of FBI investigations. FBI policy states that an FBI entity wanting to nominate an individual must provide the FBI Counterterrorism Division a memorandum containing information to support nominating the individual for inclusion on the consolidated terrorist watchlist even though it is not formally investigating the individual. The Counterterrorism Division is then responsible for submitting a request to NCTC to nominate the individual for watchlisting.
However, the FBI policy governing the nomination of known or suspected international terrorists not under FBI investigation does not describe procedures or mechanisms for modifying or removing watchlist records created by this process. Additionally, the FBI policy does not define quality control procedures to help ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information submitted to NCTC for watchlist nominations. While the FBI policy describes the process for nominating non-investigative subjects to the consolidated terrorist watchlist, it does not identify entities or procedures to be used in conducting a review of the information. In contrast, the FBI’s policies for nominating its investigative subjects include quality control procedures and mechanisms to help ensure watchlist records are modified and removed as appropriate. We believe the FBI needs to develop quality control procedures and describe mechanisms or procedures to modify or remove watchlist records for non-investigative subject nominations.
In addition, although the FBI has a formal process for nominating non-investigative subjects to the watchlist, when we discussed this process with a Counterterrorism Division section manager responsible for receiving such information and forwarding nomination requests to NCTC, we were informed that the section had not received any such nomination requests. When we discussed this issue with an NCTC official, we learned that NCTC is receiving nominations for non-investigative subjects directly from FBI field personnel. Because this nomination practice is not covered in FBI policy, there are no requirements for FBI personnel to ensure that any resulting watchlist records are updated or removed as appropriate. There is likewise no mechanism to ensure that the nominations directly passed to NCTC by field personnel are appropriate and that the information is complete and accurate."
We submitted that document (OIG 08-16) as an exhibit to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Official Capacity Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
Defendant-generated documents will prove most of our pleadings at a summary judgment stage. Most alleged facts (80% or so) were extracted verbatim from their own audit reports, statements under penalty of perjury and testimonies.
Denial of them entails perjury or sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 for misrepresenting the truth.
Ana, in Canada we have only a year to bring a doctor to court for malpractice. My case involves an attempted murder by a doctor. I have no information on this type of case. It's PART of my case, of course but it's serious and I don't want to lose the chance to make this criminal pay for what he did to me, so am I right to assume that I need to deal with him in Canada or what would be the charge against the doctor. I don't want any of my perpetrators to get away with what they have done to me and my family.
I don't believe we will get anywhere with this being aimed at the federal government.
As per the DLA's FAQ page on the LESO program which assists police with acquiring their military equipment, the STATE is solely liable for how the equipment gets used.
Now I'm going to paste a copy of my comment to the main thread which holds this information.
Please assist me with getting this information to the representing counselors of this lawsuit.
"Have you all viewed any police inventories of local police in California now-visible under the AB 481 Bill, yet?
Line number 13 under equipment lists "microwave weapons" in a plural sense:
Then in Concord, New Hampshire we see Chief of Police (Osgood) being questioned about a "secret communication equipment." Now what's odd is that the disclosure was denied under several exemptions to the right-to-know law.
One of them mentions on page 11 of the PDF copy for that court hearing (found on the following link's website under the link for "the court issued a decision" at the bottom of the page) "disclosure could provide [the target of investigation] with the ability to adjust their behaviors and avoid detection."
Does this not imply direct interaction with said target?
How would that be legal after viewing katz vs the United States? Even public payphones can't be tapped but this undisclosed communication equipment can be used against our will and without written consent?
Finally, in Florida state we see lawmakers presenting a house bill that would grant "targeted individuals" with the right to receive a notice of their targeted status, as well as a method to appeal the decision to do so:
Also according to the DLA's FAQs on the LESO program - which is only one method of acquiring military equipment - we see 49 states participating. Including California.
We are aware each state holds the final decision making for which equipment is acquired and used by their police.
We want to know which states have what, so we know which states should be held accountable.
The FAQs here state every state is individually liable for how they use the equipment. Meaning, that by aiming this lawsuit at the federal government we could face a dead-end.
Because I never interacted with anyone higher than local police prior to the timeline that my specific experience began; which is not associated with any of the above listed states.
Thank you, and we are all counting on you!!!"
Here is some further proof that local and state law enforcement are trained in the same covert electronic programs to track and conduct surveillance on targeted individuals, as it states in the program description:
I lived in Florence, AL for 4 years. A target was close friends with a state trooper since school days. He asked his friend to look into who was behind his targeting. His friend came back & told him that it was a federal program and that was all he could say about it.
Stuff flows downhill; if you want to kill a snake, you cut off the head. We have to take it to the federal level. That's not to say that state & local law enforcement may be involved, but it all relates back to the The Terrorist Watchlist (also known as the Terrorist Screening Database, or TSDB).
TJ's lawyer checks the newsletter comments on a regular basis, but she knows what she's doing.
The federal programs could entail these two, which also claim to train LOCAL and STATE level of police on tracking and surveying of Targeted Individuals:
So while it may be a federal program, it is still possible to be conducted by state and local police which provides us with a legal clause regarding the agreement in LESO 1033 -the program used to acquire the equipment being used.
See the agreement says that the federal government cannot be held responsible for how a state uses the equipment obtained:
However, we also see that the states are not mandated to provide these transparencies IN ORDER TO BE HELD LIABLE.
This is a flaw and legally can be challenged.
Also the liability waivers can be challenged see that the equipment is being used WITHIN a federal program, regardless of the agreement between the DLA and the individual state.
These are the points this lawsuit should be focusing on.
I don't think it's full-out anti-terrorist programs.
And I have every reason to believe my being placed on it was a misuse of the program.
A decision which has since then, literally tormented me into an incriminating place of being deemed as a candidate for the program.
Unlawful tactics led to this experience ensuing upon me. And that's bullshit.
Thank You. Thank You for being here, being diligent, for caring. If by any chance there is any remote type anything that i can help with, to free up your fabulous brain,lol.. i'm a pretty sharp lady regardless of the dirty work that's been inflicted... seriously, thank you.
Legal theories is only presenting the case, the court has not excepted victim statement in explaining that experience untolds by technology will give knowledge of big corporation in marketing to public, by phones devices, social media, in thief of data, banking information, police as confiscation of values taken from homes, murder as accidents, nudity and porn, torture as rape, uninvestigated crimes, and ability to influence the human to all criminal crimes. Plus suicide to those mental ill and weak. Control to power by influence of votes, judgment of court, jury, and every federal agencies in protecting secrets
I don't agree with suicide being associated with the mentally ill and weak. Some people are easier to hack than others. MK Ultra is what they've used for centuries to cause suicides. This I know, and this is the work of the CIA who, as I have asked repeatedly, "why are they not included in this lawsuit"?!!!! Still no answer.
Is there anyplace tis could write to, expressing how real these little agendas are? Perhaps if enough people wrote in, they would have to listen to the truth? I want this to be a huge success. If you win, it may open up the doors for many people who are hurting all over Gods green acres.
Everything is infiltrated. I wrote to a leader in Canada and received an answer that they had "received my email" and they thanked me, PERIOD. They call themselves a "Correspondence Unit". Everyone has a handler.
This may not be popular here but I believe these questionnaires are more info-gathering expeditions for the same entities carrying out these illegal experiments just to gage how effective the experiments are going. And I've gone on record before to say that Derrick Robinson is suspect.
Exactly, but few legit medical doctors have the integrity to tell the truth and report this fact. But yeah, I feel the incontrovertible "evidence" of my illegal experimentation move around daily. Those questionnaires are to confirm and cross-reference the data that they already have access to. This is a game for them.
I live those thoughts as well about doctors. I hate to come up with the money to make an appointment for all my things going on in my body since they arrived only to find out the doctor isn't seeing anything.
Yeah, if they can "find" proof of Havana Syndrome in US diplomats, then they can also easily pick up the presence of nanoimplants/hydragel that also give off readings. If a foreign airport security monitor can see it, then US medical professionals should be able to as well. Like I said, the problem is most don't have the courage and/or integrity to put the Hippocratic Oath above their personal aspirations. Which I get. But it sucks for TIs who could "easily" prove we have physical/tangible evidence we are being experimented on without consent.
But yeah, this TJ case could take years to wind thru the courts...in the meantime, life (and US govt illegal targeting) goes on...
I still don't have the blacklist but I have the scars from the bioweapons roaming freely in my body. I still never got an answer as to where to look for my name on a list, never got an answer as to why the CIA isn't added to the case. Not sure why you guys are more in the know than me.
Can't be national security because there's no such thing.
Yup, this is the same one. Funny thing is, I never personally spoke to him but I did fill out one of his/FFCHS' questionnaire's--just like the one TJ has on their site---and at the time since I was a newbie TI and was desperate for answers and "help", I filled it out with details and also hopped online to one of their group calls. That's where I noticed the constant gaslighting and triggers and I soon realized the futility of that org. Now, I never said anything directly to Robinson or expressed my reservations. I didn't even unsubscribe from his mailing list as I recall. But "mysteriously" it almost seemed as if he/they "read my thoughts" bc they suddenly stopped sending emails...did I mention I no longer believe in coincidences? Anyhoo...the name change from FFCHS to Pact came eventually...take that as you will.
He's just a low-level shill or gopher. I doubt he has any real power. My theory is if you see them publicly they are expendables and a low man on the totem pole. We'll never see the real puppet masters.
As target individuals of algorithm neura remote wireless for mind reading thoughts place on master computer, by artificial intelligent capable of advancement in its studies of human analysis, do it grants governments, federal and police illegal spying policing, for surveillance in studies, to harassment, torture by microwave weapons operated by cell phone towers, that being installed all around us, the police are testing how to gather evidence of crime, under policy of terrorism to use against the person and entrap other by collect of information to use in cases with courts and attorneys in abuse of human rights, for the most prevasive privacy domain in our minds, without probable cause, can say it has no conscience about how it will destroy the respect of our lives and family. Do we have a right to protect our minds from invasion of our privacy to personal disclosure of hurts and pain without judgement, who do our secrets belong too? Why am i force to share my thoughts with strangers, with knowledge to protect secrets of others from abusive behavior of thiefs.
When the world ask the legal question, am i force to give evidence or made your informity in aiding the police in its investigation against myself and other by what i hear or conversation and listen to my thoughts? Why constitutional laws was made.
Fifth Amendment
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Then in Concord, New Hampshire we see Chief of Police (Osgood) being questioned about a "secret communication equipment." Now what's odd is that the disclosure was denied under several exemptions to the right-to-know law.
One of them mentions on page 11 of the PDF copy for that court hearing (found on the following link's website under the link for "the court issued a decision" at the bottom of the page) "disclosure could provide [the target of investigation] with the ability to adjust their behaviors and avoid detection."
Does this not imply direct interaction with said target?
How would that be legal after viewing katz vs the United States? Even public payphones can't be tapped but this undisclosed communication equipment can be used against our will and without written consent?
Finally, in Florida state we see lawmakers presenting a house bill that would grant "targeted individuals" with the right to receive a notice of their targeted status, as well as a method to appeal the decision to do so:
Also according to the DLA's FAQs on the LESO program - which is only one method of acquiring military equipment - we see 49 states participating. Including California.
We are aware each state holds the final decision making for which equipment is acquired and used by their police.
We want to know which states have what, so we know which states should be held accountable.
The FAQs here say that every state is individually liable for how they use the equipment they receive. Meaning, that by aiming this lawsuit at the federal government we could face a dead-end.
Because I never interacted with anyone higher than local police prior to the timeline that my specific experience began; which is not associated with any of the above listed states.
When they volatile the constitution they automatically move from protection of America and the people to enemies of the constitution and the people! They are destroying the nation and eliminating people to bring the Chinese system and NWO. If you complain or try to stand against them the use a thing they call GAME THEORY, trying to influence you to do something that will take your freedom and possibly your life. I have been a target of this type operation. They can control situations by influencing your thoughts and what you see. Our government is no longer our government but PSYOP operators working against us all.
Much respect to Ana Toledo in her work on this case. I am aware that you can only argue legal theories on appeal which were raised at the trial level. Ana is wisely raising all the relevant legal theories in her pre trial motions so she can argue them on appeal, evan if there is no trial. Brilliant work, Ana. Thank you so much.
"The law enforcement privilege is designed "to prevent disclosure of law enforcement techniques and procedures, to preserve confidentiality of sources, to protect witness and law enforcement personnel, to safeguard the privacy of individuals involved in an investigation, and otherwise to prevent interference with an investigation." "
https://casetext.com/case/kahn-v-united-states-16
Audit of the Department of Justice Terrorist Watchlist Nomination Processes, 2008:
"Nomination of Non-Investigative Subjects
In addition to nominating subjects of its terrorist investigations, the FBI has a formal process for nominating to the watchlist known or suspected international terrorists who are not subjects of FBI investigations. FBI policy states that an FBI entity wanting to nominate an individual must provide the FBI Counterterrorism Division a memorandum containing information to support nominating the individual for inclusion on the consolidated terrorist watchlist even though it is not formally investigating the individual. The Counterterrorism Division is then responsible for submitting a request to NCTC to nominate the individual for watchlisting.
However, the FBI policy governing the nomination of known or suspected international terrorists not under FBI investigation does not describe procedures or mechanisms for modifying or removing watchlist records created by this process. Additionally, the FBI policy does not define quality control procedures to help ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information submitted to NCTC for watchlist nominations. While the FBI policy describes the process for nominating non-investigative subjects to the consolidated terrorist watchlist, it does not identify entities or procedures to be used in conducting a review of the information. In contrast, the FBI’s policies for nominating its investigative subjects include quality control procedures and mechanisms to help ensure watchlist records are modified and removed as appropriate. We believe the FBI needs to develop quality control procedures and describe mechanisms or procedures to modify or remove watchlist records for non-investigative subject nominations.
In addition, although the FBI has a formal process for nominating non-investigative subjects to the watchlist, when we discussed this process with a Counterterrorism Division section manager responsible for receiving such information and forwarding nomination requests to NCTC, we were informed that the section had not received any such nomination requests. When we discussed this issue with an NCTC official, we learned that NCTC is receiving nominations for non-investigative subjects directly from FBI field personnel. Because this nomination practice is not covered in FBI policy, there are no requirements for FBI personnel to ensure that any resulting watchlist records are updated or removed as appropriate. There is likewise no mechanism to ensure that the nominations directly passed to NCTC by field personnel are appropriate and that the information is complete and accurate."
https://oig.justice.gov/reports/plus/a0816/index.htm
We submitted that document (OIG 08-16) as an exhibit to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Official Capacity Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
Defendant-generated documents will prove most of our pleadings at a summary judgment stage. Most alleged facts (80% or so) were extracted verbatim from their own audit reports, statements under penalty of perjury and testimonies.
Denial of them entails perjury or sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 for misrepresenting the truth.
We will be free in 2023!
You're a genius!
It helps that they got greedy. They got sloppy. They thought they wouldn’t get caught.
The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry.
They had to know they would eventually. All criminals know they're to get caught eventually. Their house of cards is about to come tumbling down.
You're awesome.
If I could I could give you a 1000❤️❤️❤️
Ana, in Canada we have only a year to bring a doctor to court for malpractice. My case involves an attempted murder by a doctor. I have no information on this type of case. It's PART of my case, of course but it's serious and I don't want to lose the chance to make this criminal pay for what he did to me, so am I right to assume that I need to deal with him in Canada or what would be the charge against the doctor. I don't want any of my perpetrators to get away with what they have done to me and my family.
Thank you for the feeling that gave me reading that ! 😁 Awesome information
Thank you. 😉
T
I don't believe we will get anywhere with this being aimed at the federal government.
As per the DLA's FAQ page on the LESO program which assists police with acquiring their military equipment, the STATE is solely liable for how the equipment gets used.
Now I'm going to paste a copy of my comment to the main thread which holds this information.
Please assist me with getting this information to the representing counselors of this lawsuit.
"Have you all viewed any police inventories of local police in California now-visible under the AB 481 Bill, yet?
Line number 13 under equipment lists "microwave weapons" in a plural sense:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB481
Then in Concord, New Hampshire we see Chief of Police (Osgood) being questioned about a "secret communication equipment." Now what's odd is that the disclosure was denied under several exemptions to the right-to-know law.
One of them mentions on page 11 of the PDF copy for that court hearing (found on the following link's website under the link for "the court issued a decision" at the bottom of the page) "disclosure could provide [the target of investigation] with the ability to adjust their behaviors and avoid detection."
https://www.aclu-nh.org/en/cases/aclu-new-hampshire-and-concord-monitor-v-city-concord
Why is the behavior of the target mentioned?
Does this not imply direct interaction with said target?
How would that be legal after viewing katz vs the United States? Even public payphones can't be tapped but this undisclosed communication equipment can be used against our will and without written consent?
Finally, in Florida state we see lawmakers presenting a house bill that would grant "targeted individuals" with the right to receive a notice of their targeted status, as well as a method to appeal the decision to do so:
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2021/808/BillText/Filed/HTML
Also according to the DLA's FAQs on the LESO program - which is only one method of acquiring military equipment - we see 49 states participating. Including California.
We are aware each state holds the final decision making for which equipment is acquired and used by their police.
We want to know which states have what, so we know which states should be held accountable.
The FAQs here state every state is individually liable for how they use the equipment. Meaning, that by aiming this lawsuit at the federal government we could face a dead-end.
View the FAQs here:
https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Program-FAQs/
View the participating state's coordinator list, here:
https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/State-Coordinators/
Please make these points in the lawsuit.
Because I never interacted with anyone higher than local police prior to the timeline that my specific experience began; which is not associated with any of the above listed states.
Thank you, and we are all counting on you!!!"
Here is some further proof that local and state law enforcement are trained in the same covert electronic programs to track and conduct surveillance on targeted individuals, as it states in the program description:
Covert Electronic Tracking Program:
https://www.fletc.gov/covert-electronic-tracking-program
Covert Electronic Surveillance Program:
https://www.fletc.gov/covert-electronic-surveillance-program
Both of these claim to train LOCAL, AND STATE level of police as well; despite it being from the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.
I lived in Florence, AL for 4 years. A target was close friends with a state trooper since school days. He asked his friend to look into who was behind his targeting. His friend came back & told him that it was a federal program and that was all he could say about it.
Stuff flows downhill; if you want to kill a snake, you cut off the head. We have to take it to the federal level. That's not to say that state & local law enforcement may be involved, but it all relates back to the The Terrorist Watchlist (also known as the Terrorist Screening Database, or TSDB).
TJ's lawyer checks the newsletter comments on a regular basis, but she knows what she's doing.
The federal programs could entail these two, which also claim to train LOCAL and STATE level of police on tracking and surveying of Targeted Individuals:
Tracking~
https://www.fletc.gov/covert-electronic-tracking-program
Surveillance~
https://www.fletc.gov/covert-electronic-surveillance-program
So while it may be a federal program, it is still possible to be conducted by state and local police which provides us with a legal clause regarding the agreement in LESO 1033 -the program used to acquire the equipment being used.
See the agreement says that the federal government cannot be held responsible for how a state uses the equipment obtained:
https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Program-FAQs/
However, we also see that the states are not mandated to provide these transparencies IN ORDER TO BE HELD LIABLE.
This is a flaw and legally can be challenged.
Also the liability waivers can be challenged see that the equipment is being used WITHIN a federal program, regardless of the agreement between the DLA and the individual state.
These are the points this lawsuit should be focusing on.
I don't think it's full-out anti-terrorist programs.
And I have every reason to believe my being placed on it was a misuse of the program.
A decision which has since then, literally tormented me into an incriminating place of being deemed as a candidate for the program.
Unlawful tactics led to this experience ensuing upon me. And that's bullshit.
Also coming from Alabama, here.
I understand. As it says on TJ's website: "This is the first of several lawsuits. We are "eating the elephant" in small bites." Hold the line.
Thank you for your great work!
Thank You. Thank You for being here, being diligent, for caring. If by any chance there is any remote type anything that i can help with, to free up your fabulous brain,lol.. i'm a pretty sharp lady regardless of the dirty work that's been inflicted... seriously, thank you.
Legal theories is only presenting the case, the court has not excepted victim statement in explaining that experience untolds by technology will give knowledge of big corporation in marketing to public, by phones devices, social media, in thief of data, banking information, police as confiscation of values taken from homes, murder as accidents, nudity and porn, torture as rape, uninvestigated crimes, and ability to influence the human to all criminal crimes. Plus suicide to those mental ill and weak. Control to power by influence of votes, judgment of court, jury, and every federal agencies in protecting secrets
I don't agree with suicide being associated with the mentally ill and weak. Some people are easier to hack than others. MK Ultra is what they've used for centuries to cause suicides. This I know, and this is the work of the CIA who, as I have asked repeatedly, "why are they not included in this lawsuit"?!!!! Still no answer.
Is there anyplace tis could write to, expressing how real these little agendas are? Perhaps if enough people wrote in, they would have to listen to the truth? I want this to be a huge success. If you win, it may open up the doors for many people who are hurting all over Gods green acres.
Everything is infiltrated. I wrote to a leader in Canada and received an answer that they had "received my email" and they thanked me, PERIOD. They call themselves a "Correspondence Unit". Everyone has a handler.
This may not be popular here but I believe these questionnaires are more info-gathering expeditions for the same entities carrying out these illegal experiments just to gage how effective the experiments are going. And I've gone on record before to say that Derrick Robinson is suspect.
Exactly, but few legit medical doctors have the integrity to tell the truth and report this fact. But yeah, I feel the incontrovertible "evidence" of my illegal experimentation move around daily. Those questionnaires are to confirm and cross-reference the data that they already have access to. This is a game for them.
I live those thoughts as well about doctors. I hate to come up with the money to make an appointment for all my things going on in my body since they arrived only to find out the doctor isn't seeing anything.
Frustrating.
Yeah, if they can "find" proof of Havana Syndrome in US diplomats, then they can also easily pick up the presence of nanoimplants/hydragel that also give off readings. If a foreign airport security monitor can see it, then US medical professionals should be able to as well. Like I said, the problem is most don't have the courage and/or integrity to put the Hippocratic Oath above their personal aspirations. Which I get. But it sucks for TIs who could "easily" prove we have physical/tangible evidence we are being experimented on without consent.
But yeah, this TJ case could take years to wind thru the courts...in the meantime, life (and US govt illegal targeting) goes on...
I still don't have the blacklist but I have the scars from the bioweapons roaming freely in my body. I still never got an answer as to where to look for my name on a list, never got an answer as to why the CIA isn't added to the case. Not sure why you guys are more in the know than me.
Can't be national security because there's no such thing.
Yup, this is the same one. Funny thing is, I never personally spoke to him but I did fill out one of his/FFCHS' questionnaire's--just like the one TJ has on their site---and at the time since I was a newbie TI and was desperate for answers and "help", I filled it out with details and also hopped online to one of their group calls. That's where I noticed the constant gaslighting and triggers and I soon realized the futility of that org. Now, I never said anything directly to Robinson or expressed my reservations. I didn't even unsubscribe from his mailing list as I recall. But "mysteriously" it almost seemed as if he/they "read my thoughts" bc they suddenly stopped sending emails...did I mention I no longer believe in coincidences? Anyhoo...the name change from FFCHS to Pact came eventually...take that as you will.
He's just a low-level shill or gopher. I doubt he has any real power. My theory is if you see them publicly they are expendables and a low man on the totem pole. We'll never see the real puppet masters.
So they are against us. Then who is for us, anyone?
Free in 2023.
Listen and watch then you will understand a good part of what is taking place
As target individuals of algorithm neura remote wireless for mind reading thoughts place on master computer, by artificial intelligent capable of advancement in its studies of human analysis, do it grants governments, federal and police illegal spying policing, for surveillance in studies, to harassment, torture by microwave weapons operated by cell phone towers, that being installed all around us, the police are testing how to gather evidence of crime, under policy of terrorism to use against the person and entrap other by collect of information to use in cases with courts and attorneys in abuse of human rights, for the most prevasive privacy domain in our minds, without probable cause, can say it has no conscience about how it will destroy the respect of our lives and family. Do we have a right to protect our minds from invasion of our privacy to personal disclosure of hurts and pain without judgement, who do our secrets belong too? Why am i force to share my thoughts with strangers, with knowledge to protect secrets of others from abusive behavior of thiefs.
When the world ask the legal question, am i force to give evidence or made your informity in aiding the police in its investigation against myself and other by what i hear or conversation and listen to my thoughts? Why constitutional laws was made.
Fifth Amendment
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Will the law mandate a law to protect my brain'
Listen to the most recent episode of my podcast: WHO I REALLY AM AS A PERSON MY PERSONAL BELIEFS AND FAITH IN OPPOSITION TO WHAT IS BEING SAID https://anchor.fm/endtimeamerica/episodes/WHO-I-REALLY-AM-AS-A-PERSON-MY-PERSONAL-BELIEFS-AND-FAITH-IN-OPPOSITION-TO-WHAT-IS-BEING-SAID-e26edkq
Have you all viewed any police inventories of local police in California now-visible under the AB 481 Bill, yet?
Line number 13 under equipment lists "microwave weapons" in a plural sense:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB481
Then in Concord, New Hampshire we see Chief of Police (Osgood) being questioned about a "secret communication equipment." Now what's odd is that the disclosure was denied under several exemptions to the right-to-know law.
One of them mentions on page 11 of the PDF copy for that court hearing (found on the following link's website under the link for "the court issued a decision" at the bottom of the page) "disclosure could provide [the target of investigation] with the ability to adjust their behaviors and avoid detection."
https://www.aclu-nh.org/en/cases/aclu-new-hampshire-and-concord-monitor-v-city-concord
Why is the behavior of the target mentioned?
Does this not imply direct interaction with said target?
How would that be legal after viewing katz vs the United States? Even public payphones can't be tapped but this undisclosed communication equipment can be used against our will and without written consent?
Finally, in Florida state we see lawmakers presenting a house bill that would grant "targeted individuals" with the right to receive a notice of their targeted status, as well as a method to appeal the decision to do so:
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2021/808/BillText/Filed/HTML
Also according to the DLA's FAQs on the LESO program - which is only one method of acquiring military equipment - we see 49 states participating. Including California.
We are aware each state holds the final decision making for which equipment is acquired and used by their police.
We want to know which states have what, so we know which states should be held accountable.
The FAQs here say that every state is individually liable for how they use the equipment they receive. Meaning, that by aiming this lawsuit at the federal government we could face a dead-end.
View the FAQs here:
https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Program-FAQs/
View the participating state's coordinator list, here:
https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/State-Coordinators/
Please make these points in the lawsuit.
Because I never interacted with anyone higher than local police prior to the timeline that my specific experience began; which is not associated with any of the above listed states.
Thank you, and we are all counting on you!!!
WHAT THEY ARE DOING AND WHO IT IS FOR The Hail To The Chief Dream - Dana Coverstone
https://www.youtube.com/live/VhSvS-huYJw?feature=share
DR GREER DISCLOSED WHAT THEY ARE HIDING! THE SECRET PRIVATE TAKEOVER USING OUR MILITARY AND JUSTICE SYSTEM
https://youtu.be/xEMucYBn_58
What the state secret really is!The Great Reset | The Causes of Things Ep. 25
https://youtu.be/udCp_OZeCW4
Gang Stalking & V2K Testimony by Private Security Whistleblower
https://youtu.be/RSwTJMdaivI
When they volatile the constitution they automatically move from protection of America and the people to enemies of the constitution and the people! They are destroying the nation and eliminating people to bring the Chinese system and NWO. If you complain or try to stand against them the use a thing they call GAME THEORY, trying to influence you to do something that will take your freedom and possibly your life. I have been a target of this type operation. They can control situations by influencing your thoughts and what you see. Our government is no longer our government but PSYOP operators working against us all.