SLAM DUNK!
/
Docket 57 - 7 pages
The DOJ filed a response 4 days late. In it, they claim "Law Enforcement Privilege" is the reason they need to keep the TSDB secret.
We ask the court to strike it, because it is late, and further ridicule their claims of law enforcement privilege - which is really only viable in a criminal case. Given that the NCIC is distributing the TSDB to 74,000+ private corporations and government agencies, it is difficult to believe it is "sensitive."
The Administrative Procedures Act basically requires the government to provide the details of their policies and procedures, in writing. The DOJ claims it is a sensitive secret, even though in the ElHady v. FBI case, access was openly given to the TSDB.
Show us the List! Release the Names!
Read how Ana does a slam dunk on their arguments…
/
Docket 57 is available for download in the Blue Area of our Home page.
Please share this widely in the TI Community.
/
PACER Docket History - Case 4:23-cv-01013
/
It's a sensitive secret that they are raping, maiming, robbing, slandering and otherwise torturing their own people and for what? Nothing.
That was an awesome response to their “privilege” motion. You don’t get to cover up your criminal enterprise under a false banner of national security or criminal investigation. These people need to be prosecuted for this. They’re actually accomplices to human rights violations. They’re aiding and abetting in criminal activity. Everyone involved needs to be indicted and, when found guilty, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.