Call for inputs for the study of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee on neurotechnology and human rights
(HRC resolution 51/3)
Due on 1 July (due to time difference)
/
/
Purpose:
The Human Rights Council Advisory Committee seeks the views and inputs from stakeholders, including Member States, international and regional organizations, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, the special procedures of the Human Rights Council, the treaty bodies, other relevant United Nations agencies, funds and programmes within their respective mandates, national human rights institutions, civil society, the private sector, medical and technical communities, academic institutions and other relevant stakeholders, in order to prepare a study on the impact, opportunities and challenges of neurotechnology with regard to the promotion and protection of all human rights, including recommendations on how human rights opportunities, challenges and gaps arising from neurotechnology could be addressed by the Human Rights Council and its special procedures and subsidiary bodies in a coherent, holistic, inclusive and action-oriented manner, and to present the study to the Council at its fifty-seventh session (September 2024).
/
Next Steps
Any response to the questionnaire or inputs on the topic should be sent to the Secretariat of the Advisory Committee by 2 July 2023, either by email to OHCHR-hrcadvisorycommittee@un.org (indicating in the heading "Submission to the call for inputs on neurotechnology and human rights”) or by regular mail to the following address:
Secretariat of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee
OHCHR - United Nations Office at Geneva
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
Fax: +41 22 917 9011
Submissions will be posted on the Advisory Committee’s webpage, except for those including a clear request not to be publicly disclosed.
/
If the government criminals are blocking the link —
- you can download the forms here:
https://www.targetedjustice.com/latest-news.html
/
/
I sent an email to the UN over a decade ago about my TI experiences. The fact that they know what "neurotechnology" is tells you they know what it is and how it's being used against citizens. You don't craft policies on non-existent situations or grievances.
When we have laws that are being ignored and violated by approved government groups. The current tactic of government is terrorism and genocide of its people. What is the proper legal manner for defending yourself when you know they are trying to kill you. If they used a weapon and broke into your home it is not questionable, it is self defense. Using illegal surveillance and electronic weapons is actually breaking into your home. The laws is clear in that we are free from illegal searches and our property is safe from government. Using electronic weapons to terrorize torture and kill people is the same as shooting into someone’s house with a deadly weapon. When are we permitted to defend and protect ourselves?