Listed in this newsletter are events and conference calls for the last week of June. Getting involved in the community gives us an opportunity to meet with likeminded individuals, share in our hardships and struggles, how we can take action and find hope for the change to come.
Targeted Justice NY (and the Surrounding Area)
Host: GoGi Justice
WHEN: Thursday, June 29th
WHERE: RSVP
TIME: 7:30PM/EST
THEME: Let's MEET, MINGLE and MOBILIZE
/
“After Dinner J.A.M.” Conference Call
Hosted by GoGi NY, Targeted Justice Advisory Board Member
Time: 8:30 PM EST/7:30 PM CST/6:30 PM MT/ 5:30 PM PST
Topic: WORK TO DO, Introducing – THE LETTER!
Continued Action: FCC, SECTION 702, AFFIDAVITS
Ways To Join:
Dial-in Number: 605-313-4497
Access Code: 2832692#
Meeting ID: Gogi210
/
Women’s TI Conference Call
Hosted By Devin
Time: 10 PM EST/ 9 PM CST/ 8 PM MT/ 7 PM PST
Topic: Dealing With Stress and Anxiety
Ways To Join:
1) Join online for Video and Screen Sharing(Preferred): https://join.freeconferencecall.com/tisupportgroup
Meeting ID: Tisupportgroup
2) One Tap Mobile Dialing: +17277313453
Code: 908311#
/
TI Conference Call Hosted By Devin
Time: 10 PM EST/ 9 PM CST/ 8 PM MT/ 7 PM PST
Topic: Upcoming Rallies for the Targeted Community with Guest Speakers; Tranquility from TI Events, Cherice Moore, and Samia - Moderator of “A Time of Intercession for TIs” Conference Call
Ways To Join:
1) Join online for Video and Screen Sharing(Preferred): https://join.freeconferencecall.com/tisupportgroup
Meeting ID: Tisupportgroup
2) One Tap Mobile Dialing: +17277313453
Code: 908311#
/
Dr. Len Ber’s Weekly Podcast Episode - Week 27 since filing #TJvsGarland
Joining Len on this week’s episode are Attorney Ana Toledo and Advisory Board Member, GoGi Justice.
/
Have you all viewed any police inventories of local police in California now-visible under the AB 481 Bill, yet?
Line number 13 under equipment lists "microwave weapons" in a plural sense:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB481
Then in Concord, New Hampshire we see Chief of Police (Osgood) being questioned about a "secret communication equipment." Now what's odd is that the disclosure was denied under several exemptions to the right-to-know law.
One of them mentions on page 11 of the PDF copy for that court hearing (found on the following link's website under the link for "the court issued a decision" at the bottom of the page) "disclosure could provide [the target of investigation] with the ability to adjust their behaviors and avoid detection."
https://www.aclu-nh.org/en/cases/aclu-new-hampshire-and-concord-monitor-v-city-concord
Why is the behavior of the target mentioned?
Does this not imply direct interaction with said target?
How would that be legal after viewing katz vs the United States? Even public payphones can't be tapped but this undisclosed communication equipment can be used against our will and without written consent?
Finally, in Florida state we see lawmakers presenting a house bill that would grant "targeted individuals" with the right to receive a notice of their targeted status, as well as a method to appeal the decision to do so:
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2021/808/BillText/Filed/HTML
Also according to the DLA's FAQs on the LESO program - which is only one method of acquiring military equipment - we see 49 states participating. Including California.
We are aware each state holds the final decision making for which equipment is acquired and used by their police.
We want to know which states have what, so we know which states should be held accountable.
The following FAQs here say that every state is individually liable for how they use the equipment. Meaning, that by aiming this lawsuit at the federal government we could face a dead-end.
View the FAQs here:
https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/Program-FAQs/
View the participating state's coordinator list, here:
https://www.dla.mil/Disposition-Services/Offers/Law-Enforcement/State-Coordinators/
Please make these points in the lawsuit.
Because I never interacted with anyone higher than local police prior to the timeline that my specific experience began; which is not associated with any of the above listed states.
Further evidence of local and state level of police being trained for the electronic surveillance and tracking of "targeted individuals" is visible in the following two programs descriptions.
Covert Electronic Surveillance Program (CESP)
https://www.fletc.gov/covert-electronic-surveillance-program
Covert Electronic Tracking Program (CETP)
https://www.fletc.gov/covert-electronic-tracking-program
The description plainly states the participants of this training course are trained with "professional roleplayers [acting] as TARGETED INDIVIDUALS."
But this does NOT denote the fact that each state is held accountable for the way the equipment they received from LESO 1033 Program gets used. Those FAQs are already linked above.
Also here is a petition written by me to address the lack of public awareness and provide federal policy on the acquisition and use of the equipment.
https://www.change.org/p/federal-policy-on-all-advanced-military-grade-resources-used-by-federal-state-local-law-enforcement/exp/cl_/cl_sharecopy_36036833_en-US/8/1128985203?recruiter=1128985203&recruited_by_id=b9ba7150-c0c7-11ea-a61e-9f69683cce06&utm_source=share_petition&utm_campaign=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_content=cl_sharecopy_36036833_en-US%3A8
I know it's not the best but it comes from absolutely no experience with legal issues.
Please be aware that I am not implying responsibility or accountability onto any mentioned entity. The information was gathered by meticulously cross referencing the key words "targeted individual."
Thank you Targeted Justice LLC, we are all counting on you!!!
Thanks for the efforts because this criminals still torturing us all over the world! Outside USA Latest 👇file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/ca/10/AD6B3606-5A30-4DDA-AE30-8AC1BA6046CD/IMG_8259.HEIC