Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wilfredo Torres's avatar

I believe that TI's should organize cells in every state to regularly denounce at front of federal courts, particular federal Judges that support the Deep State-CIA-FBI' s terrorism and gang-stalking.

I ordered a 6'x3' banner and distribute flyers at front of the federal courthouse here in Manhattan, New York City; the banner and flyers include a photo of CIA-FBI agents during a warrantless raid of my apartment, the fact that the President of the United States and the Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry publicly denounce the CIA's placing the explosives that caused 9/11; names particular Judges of this court as covering-up 9/11 and gang-stalking, copies to federal officials such as the President and Attorney General, etc.

The exposure of their crimes and trashing the Constitution of the United States is uncharted territory to these federal officials which can have serious consequences.

Expand full comment
Ortaiηe Ðeviaη's avatar

I'm reviewing Judge Rosenthal's decision to deny us our day in court.

"The plaintiffs allege that reasonable suspicion is not required for an individual to be included in the Dataset under Handling Codes 3 or 4. (Id. ¶ 162). They allege that there is no way to challenge one's inclusion in the Dataset or categorization as Handling Code 3 or 4. (Id. ¶ 208)."

Allege nothing, it's in the government's OWN DOCUMENTS:

"As depicted in Exhibit 1-4, the majority of the records in the TSDB are designated as Handling Code 3."

https://oig.justice.gov/reports/FBI/a0741/intro.htm

btw: "DATABASE" is in this document 30 times. "DATASET" is not mentioned once.

"The FBI is the only DOJ component that formally nominates known or suspected terrorists for inclusion on the consolidated terrorist watchlist. We found that the FBI had established a formal watchlist nomination process with quality controls built into the process, FBI personnel understand their agency’s role in the watchlist nomination process, the FBI provides formal training and basic instruction on its watchlist nomination process, and the FBI generally has sound record management procedures for its watchlist nominations.

However, we found weaknesses in the FBI’s watchlist nomination policies, such as insufficient field office review of nomination packages for investigative subjects. In addition, there is no requirement to modify and remove, when necessary, watchlist records of non-investigative subjects. Accordingly, we are recommending that the FBI improve its quality control structure by requiring field office review of watchlist nominations to ensure accuracy and timeliness as well as developing policy for modification and removal of watchlist nominations of non-investigative subjects."

Judge Rosenthal's decision opens up an entirely new landscape to the definition of "blind justice".

This is for all practical purposed pleading for the Targeted Justice to file an appeal.

"The appellate court only reviews what happened in the trial court to decide if a legal mistake was made in the original trial. For example, to see if the trial court judge applied the wrong law to the facts of the case."

Yes, legal mistakes were made:

Amendment V

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

Amendment VI

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense."

Highest federal law in the land, federal judge. And public servants certainly have no right to torture civilians whenever they feel like it.

Expand full comment
57 more comments...

No posts