Criminal Intelligence Systems

58 FR 48452

PART 23—CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS OPERATING POLICIES

Authority: 58 FR 48452

This section of the Code of Federal Regulations is important to Targeted Individuals - because it states what the Federal Government & the FBI cannot do.

Your name should not appear on any list, unless there is a reasonable suspicion.

/

23.20(a) A project shall collect and maintain criminal intelligence information concerning an individual only if there is reasonable suspicion that the individual is involved in criminal conduct or activity and the information is relevant to that criminal conduct or activity.

23.20(b) A project shall not collect or maintain criminal intelligence information about the political, religious or social views, associations, or activities of any individual or any group, association, corporation, business, partnership, or other organization unless such information directly relates to criminal conduct or activity and there is reasonable suspicion that the subject of the information is or may be involved in criminal conduct or activity.

23.20(c) Reasonable Suspicion or Criminal Predicate is established when information exists which establishes sufficient facts to give a trained law enforcement or criminal investigative agency officer, investigator, or employee a basis to believe that there is a reasonable possibility that an individual or organization is involved in a definable criminal activity or enterprise. In an interjurisdictional intelligence system, the project is responsible for establishing the existence of reasonable suspicion of criminal activity either through examination of supporting information submitted by a participating agency or by delegation of this responsibility to a properly trained participating agency which is subject to routine inspection and audit procedures established by the project.

23.20(d) A project shall not include in any criminal intelligence system information which has been obtained in violation of any applicable Federal, State, or local law or ordinance. In an interjurisdictional intelligence system, the project is responsible for establishing that no information is entered in violation of Federal, State, or local laws, either through examination of supporting information submitted by a participating agency or by delegation of this responsibility to a properly trained participating agency which is subject to routine inspection and audit procedures established by the project.

/

So how does the FBI & DOJ get around these rules?

23.20(o) The Attorney General or designee may waive, in whole or in part, the applicability of a particular requirement or requirements contained in this part with respect to a criminal intelligence system, or for a class of submitters or users of such system, upon a clear and convincing showing that such waiver would enhance the collection, maintenance or dissemination of information in the criminal intelligence system, while ensuring that such system would not be utilized in violation of the privacy and constitutional rights of individuals or any applicable state or federal law.

/

Chris Wray is a Defendant

Fortunately, in our lawsuit, we named the Director of the FBI as a Defendant, and he cannot waive a Federal Law for himself. That is a Conflict of Interest.

And the other obvious reason, the FBI Director did not have “clear and convincing” evidence for waiving these protections of your Constitutional rights. Especially when the FBI admits that the TSDB has never stopped an act of terrorism.

According to the Inspector General - 97% of the names on the TSDB have no known ties to terrorism.

/

Read the entire federal law here:

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-I/part-23

/

TSDB goes to Washington, Dr Ber’s latest podcast

/

For the first time, Oral Arguments in a TSDB-related case have been scheduled for January 8, 2024. You can listen to the oral arguments live via this link:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/calendarsandlists.aspx

/

We kindly ask you to support the legal efforts of TargetedJustice.com

https://pay.cornerstone.cc/targetedjustice

or

https://www.patreon.com/TargetedJustice

/

Texas Voters: Do you want an Independent Nation?

The Texas Nationalist Movement (TNM) has reached the necessary signature threshold in their petition to put a proposition on the statewide primary ballot in March 2024 that will ask voters the question: “Should the State of Texas reassert its status as an independent nation?”

https://news.tnm.me/

/

Please boycott these companies:

They are opposed to FREE SPEECH and the US Constitution: Disney, IBM, Apple, Paramount, Lionsgate, Sony, NBCUniversal, UbiSoft, Comcast, Warner Bros. Discovery (CNN’s parent company), & Walmart. These corporations are infected with the woke mind virus. Please consider a Premium account on Twitter/X.

/

You can upgrade to a paid subscription newsletter (for only $8 a month).

/

/